Integrated Urban Development and Resilience Project for Greater Antananarivo (WB-P159756)

  • Madagascar
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Greater Antananarivo
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • World Bank (WB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
May 18, 2018
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Government of Madagascar
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
  • Infrastructure
  • Technical Cooperation
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 75.00 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 75.00 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Bank Documents
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ WB website

Updated in EWS Mar 21, 2019

Disclosed by Bank Aug 16, 2016

Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

The objectives of the project is to enhance urban living conditions and flood resilience in selected low-income neighborhoods of Greater Antananarivo; and to improve the Recipient’s capacity to respond promptly and effectively to an Eligible Crisis or Emergency. There are four components to the project:

  1. Improving urban drainage, services and resilience in targeted areas. This component includes three subcomponents: improvements of canal, drainage and sanitation infrastructure; neighborhood upgrading; and citizen engagement. This component, via its integrated design, aims to invest in resilience building in selected target areas of Greater Antananarivo. More specifically, this component will invest in both:
    1. flood and drainage risk reduction,
    2. urban upgrading and integration of vulnerable neighborhoods into the urban fabric, while ensuring
    3. effective and inclusive citizen engagement in diverse processes of design and implementation.
  2. Strengthening institutional capacity for resilient urban governance. To ensure the sustainability and scalability of interventions under this project, this component would seek to build the capacity of local authorities, the Commune Urbaine d'Antananarivo (CUA) and a selection among the other 36 communes that make up Greater Antananarivo (GA), to improve inter-communal governance, municipal finance, planning, and collaboration at both municipal and metropolitan levels. 
  3. Supporting Municipalities of the Greater Antananarivo for Improved Municipal and Metropolitan Governance.
    1. Metropolitan Governance. This sub-component would help provide a framework for effective metropolitan management in order to stimulate more collaborative forms of metropolitan governance; and help communes achieve economies of scale in inter-municipal service provision.
    2. Municipal Finance. This sub-component would seek to modernize public financial management (PFM) systems by supporting the implementation of the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Action Plan, including: (i) improving local revenue mobilization; (ii) improving budget strategic planning; (iii) improving budget management and information systems; (iv) rationalizing the use of public funds; and (v) implementing budget transparency, accountability and oversight mechanisms.
    3. Urban Land Management: This sub-component would: (i) assess the gap between land information mentioned in the official land registries and current land occupancies; (ii) identify the status and conduct an analysis of urban land tenure in the metropolitan area in order to develop an inventory of the State and Communal domain as well as update the land registry; (iii) define a set of modalities for land tenure regularizations to clarify property rights and to help the slum upgrading process; and (iv) define a strategy for spatial expansion at the metropolitan level, in collaboration with the PUDi for GA under preparation, taking into account land reserves
  4. Contingent Emergency Response Component -  This component would be providing immediate response to an Eligible Crisis or Emergency, as needed. This would finance emergency works in the case of another disaster event by including a "zerodollar" Contingency Emergency Response Component (CERC). 
  5. Project Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation - This component would finance the following activities: (i) incremental operating costs; (ii) fiduciary activities; (iii) audit, complaints and grievances mechanism, studies and assessments required under various project components; (iv) communication; and (v) monitoring (including of safeguards processes) and evaluation.
Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

Ministère des Finances et du Budget

Implementing Agency:
Ministère des Projets Présidentiels, de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Equipement
Gerard Andriamanohisoa
Directeur General de l'Amenagement du Territoire


The World Bank Inspection Panel is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who believe they are likely to be, or have been, adversely affected by a World Bank-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the Inspection Panel, they may investigate to assess whether the World Bank is following its own policies and procedures for preventing harm to people or the environment. You can contact the Inspection Panel or submit a complaint by emailing You can learn more about the Inspection Panel and how to file a complaint at:

How it works

How it works