According to the Bank’s website, it consists of an integrated graphite anode project powered by renewable energy, to produce low emission intensity anodes supporting green battery manufacturing in Europe.

The project comprises the following components: a) a natural graphite mine with an annual ore mining capacity of 120,000 tonnes and a concentration plant, both located at Nunasvaara South, Vittangi and b) a purification plant constructed in the port city of Luleå, Northern Sweden and an anode plant in Luleå with production capacity of 19,500 tonnes per annum anodes “Talnode®-C” (coated purified spherical natural graphite). The project is phase 1 of the broader Vittangi operation of the Promoter.

The installation falls under Annex I of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) directive 2014/52/EU amending the EIA Directive 2011/92/EU and hence is subject to a full EIA. The project requires EIAs at both the mine site and the processing plant. The permitting process is well advanced and the promoter understands the timelines associated with approval. Environmental and social aspects will be appraised in detail during due diligence. In particular, considering the presence of Sámi villages in the project area, due attention will be paid to impacts on Indigenous Peoples and how those are addressed through the EIA process and beyond.

The Talga anode production project in northern Sweden presents significant environmental, social, and governance risks, alongside documented opposition from Indigenous Sámi communities and civil society. The mine is located in Sápmi, where it overlaps with reindeer grazing lands central to Sámi livelihoods, raising serious concerns about Indigenous rights and cultural survival. Sámi herders report that the project could destroy winter grazing areas and disrupt migration routes, undermining their subsistence practices and long-term viability (Mongabay ). Civil society groups and the Saami Council have also warned that proposed mitigation measures such as seasonal mining, are insufficient and would still leave grazing lands unusable and ecosystems disturbed (Indigenous Business Review ).

Environmental risks include air and water pollution, habitat disruption, and cumulative ecological damage associated with graphite mining, which could further destabilize already fragile Arctic ecosystems (Intercontinental Cry ). These impacts are compounded by the scale of the project, which is part of a broader push to expand mining for critical minerals in the region. At the same time, the project reflects governance and procedural concerns, as Swedish authorities have overridden local planning delays and dismissed legal appeals to fast-track development due to its strategic importance for the EU’s battery supply chain (Mining.com ; North Sweden Business ).

Opposition has been sustained and multi-level, including legal appeals by Sámi communities and environmental organizations, public protests, and broader civil society criticism of inadequate consultation and environmental safeguards. Despite this resistance, courts and the Swedish government have largely upheld project approvals, highlighting tensions between “green transition” priorities and Indigenous rights, environmental protection, and local decision-making (Mining.com ; North Sweden Business ).

Talga Group Ltd is an Australia-based mining and battery materials company focused on producing graphite anodes for lithium-ion batteries. It is developing a vertically integrated supply chain in northern Sweden, including the Vittangi graphite mine and Luleå anode refinery, positioned as part of Europe’s clean energy transition. (https://in.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/TALGA-GROUP-LTD-160250660/company)

No contact information provided at the time of disclosure.

ACCESS TO INFORMATION

You can submit an information request for project information at: https://www.eib.org/en/infocentre/registers/request-form/request-form-default.htm

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF EIB

The EIB Complaints Mechanism is designed to facilitate and handle complaints against the EIB by individuals, organizations or corporations affected by EIB activities. When exercising the right to lodge a complaint against the EIB, any member of the public has access to a two-tier procedure, one internal - the Complaints Mechanism Office - and one external - the European Ombudsman. A complaint can be lodged via a written communication addressed to the Secretary General of the EIB, via email to the dedicated email address: complaints@eib.org, by completing the online complaint form available at the following address: http://www.eib.org/complaints/form via fax or delivered directly to the EIB Complaints Mechanism Division, any EIB local representation office or any EIB staff. For further details, check: http://www.eib.org/attachments/strategies/complaints_mechanism_policy_en.pdf

When dissatisfied with a complaint to the EIB Complaints Mechanism, citizens can then turn towards the European Ombudsman. A memorandum of Understanding has been signed between the EIB and the European Ombudsman establishes that citizens (even outside of the EU if the Ombudsman finds their complaint justified) can turn towards the Ombudsman on issues related to 'maladministration' by the EIB. Note that before going to the Ombudsman, an attempt must be made to resolve the case by contacting the EIB. In addition, the complaint must be made within two years of the date when the facts on which your complaint is based became known to you. You can write to the Ombudsman in any of the languages of the European Union. Additional details, including filing requirements and complaint forms, are available at: http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/atyourservice/interactiveguide.faces