Improving evaluability during execution through continuous evaluation with administrative data (IADB-RG-T4599)

Regions
  • Latin America and Caribbean
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Countries
  • Chile
  • Peru
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Financial Institutions
  • Inter-American Development Bank (IADB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Active
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
U
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Dec 5, 2024
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Borrower
IDB borrowing countries
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
Investment Type(s)
Advisory Services
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 0.34 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 0.34 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ IADB website

Updated in EWS Feb 21, 2025

Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to the IADB, the main objective of this Technical Cooperation project is to strengthen the evaluation capacities of beneficiary agencies' productive programs using administrative data. The specific objectives are to: (i) Facilitate the design and implementation of impact evaluations of two productive development public programs in Chile. It is expected that one of these programs had been advanced by Servicio de Cooperacion Tecnica (SERCOTEC) and the other one by Corporacion de Fomento (CORFO).

The evaluations will incorporate merged data from these programs and the administrative records from Chile's national tax authority, Servicio de Impuestos Internos (SII). (ii) Facilitate the design and implementation of impact evaluations of at least two productive development public programs in Peru. It is expected that one of these programs had been advanced by Pro Innovate and the other one by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (CONCYTEC) . The evaluations will utilize combined data from these programs and the administrative records of payroll, firms' performance, trade, and debt collected by various Peruvian regulatory agencies. (iii) Support the establishment of a permanent interagency cooperation agreement between Peru's Ministry of Economy and Finance and public agencies involved in productive development programs, as previously mentioned, to facilitate the sharing of administrative records concerning payroll, firms' performance, trade, and debt.(iv) Build capacities within the agencies participating in the impact evaluations referred in paragraphs (i) and (ii), for them to exploit shared administrative records for the permanent evaluation of some of their productive development programs.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

No contacts available at the time of disclosure

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF IADB

The Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism (MICI) is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who have been or are likely to be adversely affected by an Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) or Inter-American Investment Corporation (IIC)-funded project. If you submit a complaint to MICI, they may assist you in addressing the problems you raised through a dispute-resolution process with those implementing the project and/or through an investigation to assess whether the IDB or IIC is following its own policies for preventing or mitigating harm to people or the environment. You can submit a complaint by sending an email to MICI@iadb.org. You can learn more about the MICI and how to file a complaint at http://www.iadb.org/en/mici/mici,1752.html (in English) or http://www.iadb.org/es/mici/mici,1752.html (Spanish).

How it works

How it works