Moldova Green Shield: Enhancing Resilience through Ecosystem-based Adaptation (WB-P516908)

Regions
  • Europe and Central Asia
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Countries
  • Moldova
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Southern Moldova
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • World Bank (WB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Proposed
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
A
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Feb 25, 2027
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Borrower
Government of Moldova - Ministry of Environment
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
Sectors
  • Agriculture and Forestry
  • Climate and Environment
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Loan
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 10.00 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 49.28 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ WB website

Updated in EWS Aug 22, 2026

Disclosed by Bank Jun 1, 2026


Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to the Bank’s website, the objective of the project is to improve the climate resilience of targeted landscapes in southern Moldova and strengthen institutional capacity for climate-informed planning.

The project is structured around the following mutually reinforcing components/outcomes that combine landscape restoration implementation with institutional strengthening and climate-informed planning tools.

Component 1: Climate-informed Restoration Planning and Institutional Capacity Development
Component 2: Climate-Resilient Ecological Infrastructure Restoration in Production Landscapes
Component 3: Advancing Data-Driven Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Planning in the Lower Prut landscape
Component 4: Project Management, communication and reporting.

Together, the four components form an integrated EbA investment package addressing institutional planning constraints, ecological infrastructure deficits and technical decision-support gaps currently limiting implementation of climate-resilient landscape restoration interventions across southern Moldova.

Component 1 establishes restoration prioritization frameworks and implementation readiness required to guide climate-informed restoration investments.
Component 2 delivers landscape-scale ecological infrastructure restoration interventions reducing climate exposure of agricultural and forest ecosystems.
Component 3 strengthens technical decision-support capacity supporting identification of long-term adaptation pathways in climate-sensitive floodplain systems.
Component 4 ensures effective coordination, fiduciary management, environmental and social compliance, monitoring and evaluation, communication, and results reporting necessary for timely and accountable implementation.

Combined implementation of these components strengthens resilience of production landscapes across southern Moldova while supporting implementation of national forest expansion priorities and improving the capacity of institutions and communities to respond to increasing climate variability through EbA approaches.

Early Warning System Project Analysis
For a project with severe or irreversible impacts to local community and natural resources, the Early Warning System Team may conduct a thorough analysis regarding its potential impacts to human and environmental rights.

The Environmental Risk of the project is assessed as Substantial due to the scale, geographic dispersion, and cumulative nature of the proposed ecosystem based adaptation interventions, combined with the ecological sensitivity of the target landscapes and uncertainty at Concept stage regarding site selection . The project under Component 2 will finance large scale afforestation, reforestation, assisted natural regeneration, rehabilitation of degraded forest ecosystems, establishment of shelterbelts, restoration of riparian buffers, and expansion of nursery infrastructure across southern Moldova. While individually these interventions are intended to deliver positive environmental outcomes, their simultaneous implementation across interconnected forest, agricultural, pasture, and riparian systems introduces the potential for cumulative impacts on soil stability, hydrology, biodiversity, and habitat connectivity that cannot be fully defined at Concept stage. In particular, restoration activities in hydrologically dynamic areas such as the Lower Prut basin and other riparian systems may affect sediment transport, water quality, and floodplain ecology if not carefully designed, sequenced, and monitored. In addition, environmental risk is elevated by uncertainty related to site specific ecological conditions and sensitivities, as final project sites will be confirmed only after appraisal. At this stage, it is not possible to rule out the presence of ecologically sensitive habitats, high value biodiversity areas, or zones requiring specialized management, including areas near Ramsar designated wetlands should they be included at later stages.

The Social Risk is assessed as Substantial due to land-based interventions affecting vulnerable, land-dependent rural populations, combined with uncertainty around land use arrangements and potential access restrictions at the Concept stage. Activities will be implemented on state, municipal, and communal lands, including areas used by smallholder farmers for production and grazing. While land acquisition and use of informal or customary tenure are not anticipated, interventions such as afforestation, shelterbelts, and riparian buffers may result in temporary or localized restrictions on access to land and natural resources, particularly affecting pasture users. Risk is further elevated by high vulnerability in southern Moldova, where livelihoods depend heavily on land productivity and adaptive capacity is limited. Smallholder farmers are the primary group likely to be affected, and even short-term changes in land use or access may disproportionately impact poorer households if not carefully managed. While significant community resistance is not expected, political sensitivities and perceptions of inequitable site selection or benefit distribution could lead to stakeholder contestation in the absence of adequate engagement.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

IBRD Commitment: US$ 10.00 million
Green Climate Fund (grant): US$ 39.28 million
Total Project Cost: US$ 49.28 million


Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

World Bank
Fisseha Tessema Abissa
Senior Natural Resources Management Specialist

Borrower/Client/Recipient
Republic of Moldova

Implementing Agencies
Ministry of Environment

ACCESS TO INFORMATION

To submit an information request for project information, you will have to create an account to access the Access to Information request form. You can learn more about this process at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/access-to-information/request-submission

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF THE WORLD BANK

The World Bank Inspection Panel is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who believe they are likely to be, or have been, adversely affected by a World Bank-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the Inspection Panel, they may investigate to assess whether the World Bank is following its own policies and procedures for preventing harm to people or the environment. You can contact the Inspection Panel or submit a complaint by emailing ipanel@worldbank.org. Information on how to file a complaint and a complaint request form are available at: https://www.inspectionpanel.org/how-to-file-complaint

How it works

How it works