SECOND HORN OF AFRICA GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (WB-P515510)

Regions
  • Africa
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Countries
  • Kenya
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Isiolo-Mandera Regional Road Corridor
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • World Bank (WB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Approved
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
A
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Mar 27, 2026
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Borrower
Government of Kenya - ICT Authority, and others
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
Sectors
  • Infrastructure
  • Transport
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Loan
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 260.00 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 306.85 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ WB website

Updated in EWS Aug 25, 2026

Disclosed by Bank Mar 4, 2026


Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to the Bank’s website, the Project Development Objectives are to improve: (a) the movement of people and goods, along the targeted sections of the Isiolo-Mandera Regional Road Corridor; (b) digital connectivity; and (c) the capacity of selected transport related institutions in Kenya.

The financing responds to the Borrower's request dated September 30, 2025, supplemented by further information provided in a letter dated January 27, 2026 for the upgrade of two road sections totaling 143 km: Modogashe to Samatar (67 km) in the central corridor, and Rhamu to Mandera (76 km) at the northern end. These segments were initially intended to be funded by the Government of Kenya. This support will ensure that the entire 740 km Isiolo-Mandera corridor is improved, thereby facilitating regional trade and enhancing connectivity and integration among Kenya, Ethiopia, and Somalia.

Early Warning System Project Analysis
For a project with severe or irreversible impacts to local community and natural resources, the Early Warning System Team may conduct a thorough analysis regarding its potential impacts to human and environmental rights.

The environmental risk rating for HoAGDp-2 is High, because the project will have potentially significant adverse E&S risk and or impacts that are diverse, some irreversible and unprecedented. This Environmental risk rating is consistent with those assessed in respective ESIA reports in 2019 for the two road sections as well as supplementary biodiversity assessment completed for the Modogashe- Samatar section in 2023. While there are no designated conservation areas within the road alignment, the assessments confirmed presence of critical habitats in parts of the two road sections, encompassing wildlife dispersal areas outside protected zones and seasonal swamps inhabited by some species classified as endangered or critically endangered. The road works and operation are likely to impact wildlife and livestock mobility by creating permanent barrier on wildlife corridors and increased risks of collision at established livestock crossing locations, disturb wildlife from increased road traffic noise and associated lighting, and affect natural and modified habitats along the road alignment by permanent fragmentation, including potential road kills affecting both wildlife and livestock, Lorian swamp ecology and associated ecosystem services. Several settlements along the two road sections will be exposed to noise, dust, and air pollution risks. Occupational and community health and safety risks and during construction include plant/equipment accidents, electrocution, falls from height, open and deep excavations, road transport hazards, hot works, confined space entry, manual handling, attack by armed bandits and wild animals, exposure to hazardous chemicals including cement dust, hot bitumen, flying rocks, extremely hot weather among others.

The social risk rating for the project is High. HoAGDP-2 will be implemented in arid and semi-arid areas hosting communities that meet ESS7 criteria and also recognized by the Kenyan constitution as ethnic minorities and marginalized, with lower socioeconomic indicators relative to the national average. The anticipated negative social risks and impacts of the project include: (a) temporary loss of communal land for ancillary activities including borrow pits, quarry sites, camp sites, etc.; (b) influx of workers and newcomers moving into the area in search of employment opportunities; (c) overstretching and sharing the community health facilities; (d) weakening of existing social ties and communal networks which cushion the vulnerable members of the community; (e) conflicts from unrealistic and high expectations of the community from the project due to limited employment opportunities, poor stakeholder engagement and inadequate implementation of project grievance redress mechanisms; (f) labor-related grievances due to potential poor working conditions; (g) temporary economic loss to businesses that will be displaced, as some parts of the corridor traverses urban settings affecting informal roadside traders who have encroached the existing right of way, affecting an estimated total of 720 households as per the RAPs report; (h) potential exacerbation intercommunal/clan conflicts; and (i) community health and safety hazards from civil works and associated traffic, including SEA/SH risks from interactions between workers and community members and presence security personnel inclusive of armed forces.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

A proposed credit in the amount of eur 220.4 million (us$260 million equivalent).
National Government: us$46.85 million
Total Operation Cost: us$306.85 million


Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

CONTACT POINT - World Bank

Task Team Leader: Josphat O. Sasia
Title: Lead Transport Specialist
Email: Jsasia@worldbank.org

TTL Contact: Susan Apudo Owuor
Job Title: Senior Transport Specialist
Email: sowuor@worldbank.org

ACCESS TO INFORMATION

To submit an information request for project information, you will have to create an account to access the Access to Information request form. You can learn more about this process at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/access-to-information/request-submission

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF THE WORLD BANK

The World Bank Inspection Panel is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who believe they are likely to be, or have been, adversely affected by a World Bank-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the Inspection Panel, they may investigate to assess whether the World Bank is following its own policies and procedures for preventing harm to people or the environment. You can contact the Inspection Panel or submit a complaint by emailing ipanel@worldbank.org. Information on how to file a complaint and a complaint request form are available at: https://www.inspectionpanel.org/how-to-file-complaint

How it works

How it works