Implementation of AfCFTA and AIDA Impact Assessments in Selected African Transition Economies (AFDB-P-Z1-KZ0-066)

Regions
  • Africa
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Countries
  • Cameroon
  • Chad
  • Comoros
  • Madagascar
  • Togo
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Financial Institutions
  • African Development Bank (AFDB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Approved
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
C
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Jul 13, 2026
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Borrower
African Union Development Agency–NEPAD
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
Sectors
  • Technical Cooperation
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Advisory Services, Grant
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 3.47 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Grant Amount (USD)
$ 3.47 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 3.47 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ AFDB website

Updated in EWS Aug 11, 2026


Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to bank's website, the Catalysing Integrated Trade and Industrial Policy Reform Project: Implementing the AfCFTA/AIDA Impact Assessments in Selected African Economies in Transition is a multinational technical-assistance and institutional-strengthening operation covering Cameroon, Chad, Comoros, Madagascar and Togo. The project is designed to help these countries translate the commitments of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the Accelerated Industrial Development of Africa (AIDA) into more coherent, inclusive and evidence-based national trade and industrial policies. The project will institutionalize and apply the AfCFTA/AIDA Standard Impact Assessment Guide within national policymaking systems. It will strengthen the technical and analytical capacity of public institutions, improve the availability and use of sector-specific and disaggregated data, and support national assessments of competitiveness, priority value chains and the socioeconomic, gender, youth, climate and fragility implications of AfCFTA and AIDA implementation. It will also enhance the assessment methodology by integrating green industrialization, climate-resilient trade infrastructure, MSME participation, informal trade and conflict-sensitive planning. The project comprises three main components: (i) capacity development and technical support for national assessments, (ii) evidence generation and strengthening of the impact-assessment methodology, and (iii) knowledge sharing, advocacy and partnership development. Key activities include training policymakers and technical experts, conducting country and sector assessments, strengthening monitoring and evaluation systems, updating the web-based Impact Assessment Platform, producing policy briefs and country reports, and facilitating national, regional and continental peer-learning and policy dialogue. The total project cost is estimated at UA 2.794 million, equivalent to approximately USD 3.83 million. It will be financed by an ADF-16 Regional Public Goods grant of UA 2.54 million, equivalent to about USD 3.48 million, and an in-kind contribution from AUDA-NEPAD of UA 0.254 million, equivalent to approximately USD 0.35 million. The AUDA-NEPAD contribution will cover technical expertise, office space, utilities and operational support to the project implementation unit. The project also builds on earlier support from JICA and complementary engagement with the WTO, UNDP and UNIDO, but it is not structured as a formal co-financing operation. The grant recipient and executing agency is the African Union Development Agency–NEPAD.

Early Warning System Project Analysis
For a project with severe or irreversible impacts to local community and natural resources, the Early Warning System Team may conduct a thorough analysis regarding its potential impacts to human and environmental rights.

Environmental Category: [3] Low Risk

Climate Safeguards Categorization: [3] Projects are not vulnerable to climate risk

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

African Development Fund

Financial Instrument: Project Cycle Grant

Masterloan number: 2100155044369

Commitment (UA): 2,540,000


Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

Name: Memory DUBE

Email: m.dube@afdb.org 

ACCESS TO INFORMATION

You can submit an information request for project information at: https://www.afdb.org/en/disclosure-and-access-to-information/request-for-documents. Under the AfDBÕs Disclosure and Access to Information policy, if you feel the Bank has omitted to publish information or your request for information is unreasonably denied, you can file an appeal at https://www.afdb.org/en/disclosure-and-access-to-information/appeals-process.

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF AfDB

The Independent Review Mechanism (IRM), which is administered by the Compliance Review and Mediation Unit (CRMU), is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who have been or are likely to be adversely affected by an African Development Bank (AfDB)-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the IRM, it may assist you by either seeking to address your problems by facilitating a dispute resolution dialogue between you and those implementing the project and/or investigating whether the AfDB complied with its policies to prevent environmental and social harms. You can submit a complaint electronically by emailing crmuinfo@afdb.org, b.kargougou@afdb.org, b.fall@afdb.org, and/or s.toure@afdb.org. You can learn more about the IRM and how to file a complaint at: https://www.afdb.org/en/independent-review-mechanism/

How it works

How it works