Multinational (EAC, COMESA and SADC) - Tripartite Capacity Building Programme, Phase II (AFDB-P-Z1-KZ0-040)

  • Africa
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Financial Institutions
  • African Development Bank (AFDB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Jan 20, 2020
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
*Borrower information not provided at the time of disclosure*
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
  • Industry and Trade
  • Law and Government
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 1.18 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ AFDB website

Updated in EWS Sep 8, 2020

Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to bank documents, the Project will address the key developmental challenge of low intra-African trade focusing on tackling the problems of small, fragmented markets, overlapping Regional Economic Community (REC) membership, which creates a spaghetti bowl of trade rules, a proliferation of non-tariff barriers and information asymmetries, which limit the ability of traders, especially women, to effectively take advantage of market access opportunities. The key outputs will be the development of guidelines/procedures/regulations/manuals necessary for implementation of the TFTA Agreement, and roll out online databases for Non-Tariff Measures (NTMs), building on the pilots under phase I.

The proposed operation is a grant of UA850, 000.00 to finance the Tripartite Capacity Building Programme, Phase II in three (3) Regional Economic communities, namely COMESA, East African Community (EAC) and Southern Africa Development Community (SADC). The Tripartite Free Trade Area (TFTA) Agreement is a major milestone in Africa's efforts to overcome the challenges of small, fragmented markets and overlapping REC membership, which creates a spaghetti bowl of trade rules. It consolidates the markets of three RECs, namely COMESA, EAC and SADC into a seamless free trade area. Together, these RECs cover a USD1.3 trillion market representing 56% of Africa's GDP and approximately 740 million consumers spread across 29 Countries. The TFTA also aims at tackling non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs), which tend to rise as countries resort to unfair regulatory and other trade restricting measures when tariffs fall, thereby inhibiting cross border trade. The Project will complement the support provided by the Bank under TCBP Phase I and give the impetus to implement the negotiated TFTA Agreement. This is a stand-alone operation, within the framework of the Bank's Regional Integration Strategic Framework (RISF, 2018-2025). The Project will bridge the identified capacity gaps not fully supported by other DPs towards operationalizing the Free Trade Area. Indeed, the proposed operation will provide technical assistance and capacity building to the 3 RECs and their RMCs to operationalize the TFTA Agreement, which was signed in Sharm El Shekh, Egypt in 2015. Key outputs from the Bank's intervention will be the development of guidelines, procedures, regulations and manuals required to operationalize the Agreement in areas such as rules of origin and dispute settlement. The Project will also support the establishment of online databases for non-tariff measures in Tripartite RMCs, building on the pilots under phase I. This will improve transparency in trade, speed up the resolution of non-tariff barriers (NTBs), deter arbitrary application of regulatory measures that hinder trade, and improve awareness of traders about legitimate regulatory requirements, which provides a foundation for them to improve their capacity for compliance. The Project will also provide training to members of regional business councils/chambers on the applicable rules of origin and disseminate information on TFTA trade rules and opportunities through the Bank-funded 50 million WS Platform for entrepreneurs. The project will also support the implementation of Tripartite Simplified Trade Regime (STR). Implementation will take a period of 24 months, from grant effectiveness.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

Name KANYIMBO Patrick 


The Independent Review Mechanism (IRM), which is administered by the Compliance Review and Mediation Unit (CRMU), is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who have been or are likely to be adversely affected by an African Development Bank (AfDB)-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the IRM, it may assist you by either seeking to address your problems by facilitating a dispute resolution dialogue between you and those implementing the project and/or investigating whether the AfDB complied with its policies to prevent environmental and social harms. You can submit a complaint electronically by emailing,,, and/or You can learn more about the IRM and how to file a complaint at

How it works

How it works