• Liberia
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • African Development Bank (AFDB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Oct 21, 2015
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
  • Finance
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 1.46 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Currency conversion note:
Bank reported UAC 2.03 million
Converted using 2015-10-21 exchange rate.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ AFDB website

Updated in EWS Jul 4, 2017

Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.
According to AfDB: "The project is designed in line with countries National Post Ebola Recovery Plans and guided by the findings of the recently undertaken Ebola Recovery Assessment (ERA) mission to the sub-region in January 2015. The ERA was in response to a call by the UN Secretary-General and the Governments of Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone and conducted by a multi-partner team led by the UNDP, AFDB, WB and EU to contribute to laying the foundation for the short, medium and long term recovery while the emergency response continues to contain the epidemic. In effect, the ERA mission served as an identification mission for this project. All three governments have prioritized health care and nutrition, WASH, education, agriculture and social protection for recovery. The project can be designed in a number phases and the design shall be as flexible as possible and go beyond the three affected countries by considering also all the neighboring countries or all ECOWAS countries." The project has the following components: Component 1: Restoring and strengthening capacity of public health systems and basic social services 1.1 Promoting Health Service delivery 1.2 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Component 2: Restoring livelihoods stabilization and building community resilience 2.1 Social protection and community support systems 2.2 Nutrition and food security The implementing agency is MANO RIVER UNION.
Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.
PROJECT CONTACTS BUDALI Issahaku - RDGW4 No contact details at the time of disclosure. ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF AfDB The Independent Review Mechanism (IRM), which is administered by the Compliance Review and Mediation Unit (CRMU), is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who have been or are likely to be adversely affected by an African Development Bank (AfDB)-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the IRM, it may assist you by either seeking to address your problems by facilitating a dispute resolution dialogue between you and those implementing the project and/or investigating whether the AfDB complied with its policies to prevent environmental and social harms. You can submit a complaint electronically by emailing,,, and/or You can learn more about the IRM and how to file a complaint at

How it works

How it works