South Sudan-Ethiopia-Djibouti: Transport Corridor Project- Phase II (AFDB-P-Z1-DB0-291)

Countries
  • Djibouti
  • Ethiopia
  • South Sudan
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Juba–Addis Ababa–Djibouti corridor
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • African Development Bank (AFDB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Approved
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
A
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Dec 2, 2025
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Borrower
Regional - Ministry of Roads and Bridges (MoRB)
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
Sectors
  • Infrastructure
  • Transport
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Grant
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 3.41 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 361.89 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ AFDB website

Updated in EWS Aug 8, 2026


Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to the Bank’s website, the Multinational South Sudan–Ethiopia–Djibouti Transport Corridor Project – Phase II aims to strengthen a key regional trade and transport artery across the Horn of Africa. The project will improve critical segments of the Juba–Addis Ababa–Djibouti corridor through infrastructure construction, technical support, logistics facilitation, institutional capacity-building, and resettlement measures where required. The total project cost is estimated at UA 266.63 million, financed mainly through ADF grants allocated to the three countries, including UA 1.50 million for South Sudan, UA 138.66 million for Ethiopia, and UA 22.70 million for Djibouti. Additional resources include UA 1 million from the Transition Support Facility (TSF) for South Sudan, UA 0.26 million from the Climate Action Window for Ethiopia, a parallel co-financing of UA 76.39 million (approximately USD 100 million) from the Korea Exim Bank for Ethiopia, and a government counterpart contribution of UA 26.12 million from Ethiopia. Contributions from South Sudan and Djibouti remain below 10% of project cost in line with justified country conditions.

The overarching development objective is to improve transport connectivity among South Sudan, Ethiopia, and Djibouti. More specifically, the project seeks to remove key bottlenecks on the corridor, enhance efficiency in the movement of goods and people, support trade expansion, and promote deeper regional integration within the Horn of Africa. By facilitating mobility and reducing transport costs, the project is expected to stimulate economic activity, strengthen resilience, reduce poverty, and create new economic opportunities for communities along the corridor. The intervention is aligned with the SDGs; Agenda 2063; and regional integration priorities, including the Horn of Africa Initiative.

The project benefits a vast population along the corridor. In South Sudan, it will serve the Boma region, home to an estimated 214,676 people. In Ethiopia, the road sections traverse the Oromia, Afar, and Amhara regions, with an estimated 500,000 inhabitants living in the directly affected zones. In Djibouti, the project impacts communities along the Djibouti–Dikhil axis and rural districts targeted by complementary investments. Beyond local populations, the project benefits traders, transport operators, women entrepreneurs, small businesses, and national and regional economies that depend on reliable access to Djibouti’s ports—through which more than 90% of Ethiopia’s imports and exports transit. Improved infrastructure and logistics will therefore generate wide-ranging social and economic gains across the three countries.

Early Warning System Project Analysis
For a project with severe or irreversible impacts to local community and natural resources, the Early Warning System Team may conduct a thorough analysis regarding its potential impacts to human and environmental rights.

Environmental Category: [1] High Risk

The project is classified as Category 1 and validated in ISTS on June 19, 2024. This Category 1 is justified considering the proposed activities and identified construction sites and the significant E&S risks and impacts the project is associated with. The proposed project is a large-scale expressway transport project, and core project activities and ancillary facilities will potentially generate adverse impacts on the nearby biophysical and social environment as well as sensitive receptors, that include Awash National Park (in Ethiopia), farmland, and assets and property belonging to communities in the proposed project implementation areas.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

The total project cost is estimated at UA 266.63 million, financed mainly through ADF grants allocated to the three countries, including UA 1.50 million for South Sudan, UA 138.66 million for Ethiopia, and UA 22.70 million for Djibouti. Additional resources include UA 1 million from the Transition Support Facility (TSF) for South Sudan, UA 0.26 million from the Climate Action Window for Ethiopia, a parallel co-financing of UA 76.39 million (approximately USD 100 million) from the Korea Exim Bank for Ethiopia, and a government counterpart contribution of UA 26.12 million from Ethiopia. Contributions from South Sudan and Djibouti remain below 10% of project cost in line with justified country conditions.

Financial Instrument: Project Cycle Grant / Institutional Support and Rehabilitation Grant
Commitments (UA): 2,500,000
Conversion Rate USD (2026-04-19): 1,36507
Commitments (USD): 3,412,675


Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

Name: Bassy Jeremy AGUMA
Email: j.aguma@afdb.org

ACCESS TO INFORMATION

You can submit an information request for project information at: https://www.afdb.org/en/disclosure-and-access-to-information/request-for-documents. Under the AfDBs Disclosure and Access to Information policy, if you feel the Bank has omitted to publish information or your request for information is unreasonably denied, you can file an appeal at https://www.afdb.org/en/disclosure-and-access-to-information/appeals-process.

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF AfDB

The Independent Review Mechanism (IRM), which is administered by the Compliance Review and Mediation Unit (CRMU), is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who have been or are likely to be adversely affected by an African Development Bank (AfDB)-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the IRM, it may assist you by either seeking to address your problems by facilitating a dispute resolution dialogue between you and those implementing the project and/or investigating whether the AfDB complied with its policies to prevent environmental and social harms. You can submit a complaint electronically by emailing crmuinfo@afdb.org, b.kargougou@afdb.org, b.fall@afdb.org, and/or s.toure@afdb.org. You can learn more about the IRM and how to file a complaint at: https://www.afdb.org/en/independent-review-mechanism/

How it works

How it works