Douala Infrastructure Development Project (WB-P000378)

Countries
  • Cameroon
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Douala and Yaounde
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • World Bank (WB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Closed
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
C
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Oct 27, 1988
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Borrower
Government of Cameroon - Ministry of Urban Plamning and Housing (MINlH)
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
Sectors
  • Infrastructure
  • Transport
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Loan
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 146.00 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 253.50 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ WB website

Updated in EWS Aug 9, 2024


Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to the Bank’s website, the project originally consisted of the physical improvement of a slum area of about 250,000 inhabitants in Douala (1.5 million inhabitants), the country's port and economic center.  It also included civil works intended to improve traffic conditions in Douala and Yaounde, the capital city (1 million inhabitants). However, at the appraisal stage, PDU2 evolved into a far more complex project in relation to its original design. The project was expanded to further address institutional issues that had been raised in a sector policy letter and action plan that was drafted at appraisal stage on the basis of lessons drawn from the implementation of PDU1.

The project's design was intended to support implementation of the government's Sector Policy and Action Plan which was drawn up with the Bank's assistance and had 12 principal objectives. Among these objectives the project was to focus on the following: (a) setting up workable mechanisms to promote investment; (b) improving mobilization of local resources; (c) providing secure land tenure as an incentive for private investment; and (d) increasing the role of the private sector in housing and land development. All these objectives were spelled out and agreed in a letter accompanying the loan agreement, along with over 30 actions designed to improve integration between urban operations and economic development.

The project was intended to: (a) consolidate the basis for sustainable and replicable urban development which had been initiated under the first urban project; (b) encourage economic and social development by improving infrastructure and access to urban services, particularly in the lower income areas; (c) improve the distribution of responsibility across central and municipal levels of government as well as public and private providers of urban services; and (d) strengthen management capabilities of all urban agencies and develop replicable upgrading programs financed by local resources, with emphasis on improved cost recovery. The project was also seen as a stepping stone in the definition of the government's urban strategy, which was expected to provide the basis for a broad sector approach in future Bank lending.

 

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

(a) a loan agreement between the government and the Bank spelling out the tasks to be carried out by the various agencies as agreed, with a loan of US$146.0 million from the Bank, and counterpart funding from the government of US$107. 5 million, amounting to a total project cost of US$253.5 million;
(b) a project agreemnent between the Bank and the Credit Foncier (CFC) for on-lending for a municipal credit fund; and
(c) a project agreement between the Bank and MAETUR for land development.


Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

No contacts available at the time of disclosure.

How it works

How it works