Nearshoring and FDI Diversification in LAC (IFC-609045)

Countries
  • Guatemala
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Financial Institutions
  • International Finance Corporation (IFC)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Approved
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
U
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Jul 28, 2024
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Sectors
  • Finance
  • Technical Cooperation
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Advisory Services
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 1.84 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ IFC website

Updated in EWS Jul 9, 2026

Disclosed by Bank May 12, 2026


Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

According to the IFC, this project will build on the findings from the previous activities through AS 607870. The program will use the in-depth assessment of sectors/sub-sectors along with the identified recommendations in CACM countries. This will support selected countries in the development of FDI attraction strategies and enhance supply chain development to maximize the development impact and sustainability of nearshoring investments. The goal is to improve national competitiveness, prioritize and strengthen strategic industries, define a clear value proposition aligned to nearshoring trends, and adopt best practices to attract investment.

Using these insights and strategic discussions with internal and external counterparts, the project will define countries to develop sub-projects. Through these IPs, country-specific TA will be provided to support enabling environment reforms identified and to build the private sector institutional capacity to leverage nearshoring and attract FDI.

Though the activities for this program will vary by country, they will include the provision of TA designed to strengthen the countries’ institutional capacities to attract higher quality FDI and support supplier development activities necessary for a sustainable nearshoring.

Investor targeting and firm-level upstream or advisory support through sub-projects will also be important to ensure high quality FDI, for example avoiding sectors associated with considerable carbon emissions and focusing on target investors with a proven track record to greening their supply chain end-to-end.

The project expects to deliver this advisory through the following components (tailored to each country):

1.1 Institutional Impact Assessment
To complement the investor survey developed during the DnS, the team will carry out an assessment of Investment Promotion Agencies (IPA) or other relevant institutions in selected countries. This assessment will set an institutional benchmark from which the impact of TA to be provided can be measured. Specifically, this assessment aims to:
-Determine institutional priorities and level of support needed.
-Emphasis on building on strengths than minimizing weaknesses while establishing a framework optimizing donor cohesion.
-Draw linkages between investor survey conclusions and IPA or other relevant institutions' strategies and institutional priorities.

1.2. Country Analysis and Nearshoring Feasibility
This subcomponent will combine insights from the Nearshoring D&S and activity 1.1. to determine country and industry readiness for nearshoring. Using these conclusions, feasibility will be determined based on the competitive advantages, political context, business environment, private sector perceptions and trends, logistics and production infrastructure, priority industries, IPA/other relevant agency strategy and capacities, and national priorities (government expression of interest).

1.3 Specific industry studies to focus SME program.
This activity will be done for Mexico, and may be replicated at a later stage in other countries to be identified.

1.4 Preparation of Implementation Plans
Using the outputs from the previous activities and the country’s expression of interest, the team will select the countries for IPs. These will consider strategic sectors and key stakeholders for the provision of TA assistance, training, and capacity building, to create a feasible and sustainable nearshoring attraction strategy.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

ACCESS TO INFORMATION

You can submit a request for information disclosure at: https://disclosures.ifc.org/#/inquiries

If you believe that your request for information from IFC has been unreasonably denied, or that this Policy has been interpreted incorrectly, you can submit a complaint at the link above to IFC's Access to Information Policy Advisor, who reports directly to IFC's Executive Vice President.

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM OF IFC/MIGA

The Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who believe they are likely to be, or have been, adversely affected by an IFC or MIGA- financed project. If you submit a complaint to the CAO, they may assist you in resolving a dispute with the company and/or investigate to assess whether the IFC is following its own policies and procedures for preventing harm to people or the environment. If you want to submit a complaint electronically, you can email the CAO at CAO@worldbankgroup.org You can learn more about the CAO and how to file a complaint at http://www.cao-ombudsman.org

How it works

How it works