• Ethiopia
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Financial Institutions
  • International Finance Corporation (IFC)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Jul 5, 2018
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Government of Ethiopia
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
  • Industry and Trade
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
Advisory Services
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 1.00 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Bank Documents
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ IFC website

Updated in EWS May 8, 2019

Disclosed by Bank May 2, 2019

Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

The proposed program will be implemented through 2 main pillars: (1) Component I: Industrial parks sustainability and textile/ footwear sector reforms reforms; (2) Component II: Promoting sector sustainability and eco-industrial parks.

Component I: Industrial parks sustainability and textile/ footwear sector reforms – The project will leverage the World Bank Groups ongoing engagements and dialogue on the Government’s industrial parks and industrialization programs and carry out analysis to further drill down into the emerging challenges on environmental sustainability of the IPs and the selected sectors and identify regulatory and administrative gaps and constraints. This component will have 4 areas of intervention:

1. Technical sector analysis of current environmental performance of selected industries –The project will conduct research and survey existing investors in the industrial parks and assess the main challenges and concerns on competitiveness highlighting environmental and resource factors. This will include data on environmental performance and compliance, resource efficiency and common green infrastructure opportunities. The main focus will be on industrial parks, but solutions will also consider industries outside of industrial parks. This analysis will identify regulatory challenges, but also cost effective operating and technology solutions that sectors and industrial park operators can use to improve sustainability.
2. Identify regulatory gaps for current status of regulations and performance of sector and suggestions for future changes - The country doesn’t have a green manufacturing policy in place yet, even though there are new initiatives to develop green manufacturing strategy and policy. On the other hand, there are binding/stringent constraints in the current environmental strategy of Ethiopia at the Ministry of Environment which were enacted 20 years ago. These regulations are not adequate to respond to current realities and the Government’s ambitious industrialization strategy. The project will assist GoE in the formulation of a structured policy for sustainable industrialization and help formulate compliance standards for sustainable manufacturing within industrial parks while still maintaining the sectors’ global competitiveness.
3. Development of sustainability action plan for industrial parks – Based on the technical analysis, the project will design sustainability action plans for selected industrial parks. GIZ has been developing a project to set up Environmental Social Management Framework at IPs. The project will coordinate with GIZ to give a comprehensive approach to GoE on addressing E&S related issues in IPs.
4. Sector sustainability roadmap– Lastly, based on the technical analysis and benchmarking exercise and in consultation with private sector actors, the team will develop sector specific sustainability action plans for the textile and footwear sectors. This action plan will provide further details and prioritization of actions for the growth of these sectors. It will provide guidance on how these may be implemented in the industrial parks framework, and will be aligned with the sustainability action plan for the IPs.

Component II: Promoting sector sustainability and eco-industrial parks – Based on component 1 findings, the project will work together with government agencies, private sector, development partners and other stakeholders to help implement sustainability actions within the industrial parks and will include (I) Pilot implementation of actions in industrial parks; (ii) Potential for sustainable textile and footwear sectors and promotion of Ethiopia as a sustainable investment location; and (iii) Where possible, the project will identify financing opportunities in the textile and footwear sectors and recommend potential investment vehicles to support investments in technologies and actions that support sustainability in IPs.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

No contact information provided at the time of disclosure


The Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO) is the independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who believe they are likely to be, or have been, adversely affected by an IFC or MIGA- financed project. If you submit a complaint to the CAO, they may assist you in resolving a dispute with the company and/or investigate to assess whether the IFC is following its own policies and procedures for preventing harm to people or the environment. If you want to submit a complaint electronically, you can email the CAO at You can learn more about the CAO and how to file a complaint at

How it works

How it works