Enhancing Competition in Public Service Delivery (ADB-50147-001)

  • China
Geographic location where the impacts of the investment may be experienced.
Specific Location
Nation wide
Whenever identified, the area within countries where the impacts of the investment may be experienced. Exact locations of projects may not be identified fully or at all in project documents. Please review updated project documents and community-led assessments.
Financial Institutions
  • Asian Development Bank (ADB)
International, regional and national development finance institutions. Many of these banks have a public interest mission, such as poverty reduction.
Project Status
Stage of the project cycle. Stages vary by development bank and can include: pending, approval, implementation, and closed or completed.
Bank Risk Rating
Environmental and social categorization assessed by the development bank as a measure of the planned project’s environmental and social impacts. A higher risk rating may require more due diligence to limit or avoid harm to people and the environment. For example, "A" or "B" are risk categories where "A" represents the highest amount of risk. Results will include projects that specifically recorded a rating, all other projects are marked ‘U’ for "Undisclosed."
Voting Date
Oct 5, 2016
Date when project documentation and funding is reviewed by the Board for consideration and approval. Some development banks will state a "board date" or "decision date." When funding approval is obtained, the legal documents are accepted and signed, the implementation phase begins.
Government of the People’s Republic of China
A public entity (government or state-owned) provided with funds or financial support to manage and/or implement a project.
  • Finance
  • Law and Government
The service or industry focus of the investment. A project can have several sectors.
Investment Type(s)
The categories of the bank investment: loan, grant, guarantee, technical assistance, advisory services, equity and fund.
Investment Amount (USD)
$ 0.60 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Project Cost (USD)
$ 0.60 million
Value listed on project documents at time of disclosure. If necessary, this amount is converted to USD ($) on the date of disclosure. Please review updated project documents for more information.
Primary Source

Original disclosure @ ADB website

Updated in EWS Jul 2, 2020

Disclosed by Bank Oct 11, 2016

Contribute Information
Can you contribute information about this project?
Contact the EWS Team

Project Description
If provided by the financial institution, the Early Warning System Team writes a short summary describing the purported development objective of the project and project components. Review the complete project documentation for a detailed description.

The TA is composed of two components. Component A will assist MOF's Treasury Department in enhancing the present procurement system. Component B will help China PPP Center (CPPPC) to further develop the PPP information disclosure system. ADB field missions and reached an understanding on the objectives, scope, implementation arrangements, costs and TORs for the TA.

Output 1: Government procurement system assessment tool developed. Building on past reviews by the PRC, ADB, and other development partners, output 1 will conduct an assessment on the strengths and weaknesses of the government procurement system and the roles of key government agencies involved in procurement. Output 1 also will conduct research on the legal framework governing procurement centrally and locally, and on the procurement practices adopted by different government agencies. It will also identify any weaknesses and opportunities for further improvements, as well as opportunities to align with best international practices. The TA will develop the GPAT in line with international good practices, notably the Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The GPAT will provide a user-friendly tool for ongoing assessments of the quality and effectiveness of government procurement. The TA will pilot the use of the GPAT in selected implementing agencies, which MOF and ADB will jointly identify.

Output 2: Policy recommendations for improvements of the existing procurement system drafted. Based on the assessment of the present procurement system and the pilot use of the GPAT, the consultant team will prepare recommendations for further refinement of the GPAT and government procurement.

Output 3: Policy recommendations on public–private partnership disclosure drafted. The TA will review the information disclosure frameworks and practices for PPPs in other jurisdictions. Output 3 will identify the key drivers of disclosure. It will prepare an overview of the general transparency environment, the history and outlook for PPP disclosure, political economy considerations, the legal and policy framework, the disclosure process, the relevant institutions and their roles, and how confidential information is treated. Output 3 will address key issues in PPP contract information disclosure, including confidentiality requirements, templates, technology, and bid terms and conditions. It will also analyze the disclosure approaches for different stages of the PPP project life cycle.

Output 4: Public–private partnership disclosure guidelines drafted. The TA will draft guidelines for CPPPC’s consideration, drawing on output 3. The guidelines will also build on relevant public information disclosure regulations and be consistent with CPPPC’s mandates. They will identify the required information disclosure at each stage of project preparation and implementation.

Investment Description
Here you can find a list of individual development financial institutions that finance the project.

Contact Information
This section aims to support the local communities and local CSO to get to know which stakeholders are involved in a project with their roles and responsibilities. If available, there may be a complaint office for the respective bank which operates independently to receive and determine violations in policy and practice. Independent Accountability Mechanisms receive and respond to complaints. Most Independent Accountability Mechanisms offer two functions for addressing complaints: dispute resolution and compliance review.

Ministry of Finance
Sanlihe, Xicheng District
People's Republic of China


The Accountability Mechanism is an independent complaint mechanism and fact-finding body for people who believe they are likely to be, or have been, adversely affected by an Asian Development Bank-financed project. If you submit a complaint to the Accountability Mechanism, they may investigate to assess whether the Asian Development Bank is following its own policies and procedures for preventing harm to people or the environment. You can learn more about the Accountability Mechanism and how to file a complaint at: http://www.adb.org/site/accountability-mechanism/main

How it works

How it works